Reverse
Logistics, an integral and crucial part of any supply chain, is still
an unorganized business sector in India. However, this doesn't mean
that the companies are not paying any attention to this aspect of
supply chain. The consumer is the key today and everything is driven
towards keeping this segment smiling. This has resulted in the
evolution of supply chain management in this country. Now, the result
of which is a tremendous profitable business scope for solution
providers. For newbies, who are yet to understand the concept of
reverse logistics, this critical aspect of any supply chain
management involves the process of planning, implementing, and
controlling the efficient, cost-effective flow of raw materials,
in-process inventory, finished goods and related information from the
point of consumption to the point of origin for the purpose of
recapturing value or proper disposal. More precisely, reverse
logistics is the process of moving goods from their typical final
destination for the purpose of capturing value, or proper disposal.
The
market
size of third-party service providers is yet to be measured, as it is
still at a nascent stage and is unorganized. Interestingly, the focus
area these days is from warranty repairs to refurbishment services,
in short the integrated life-cycle of products. The OEMs and ODMs are
turning to a low-cost outsourcing model for their warranty support
and repair needs. The nature of this business is such that the
manufacturer and vendor community along with solution providers are
charting out strategies addressing the issue in a holistic manner. In
this space, there are few names to reckon with, which include Accel
Frontline, InTarvo Technologies, Aforeserve.com, Reverse Logistics Co
and a few more. These are the ones who have realised the business
potential and are the leaders in this sector.
Most of
the OEMs like to keep their eggs in one basket, may be 2 or 3
maximum. Not all solution providers get this opportunity, but they
can do it for their own customers. However, when they will do it for
their customers, the OEMs will want to support them through heir own
partners ie their reverse logistics players. Like for example, Dell
does all these activities through its appointed player and similar
kind of system is followed by Acer. Nitin Shah of Allied Digital
Services said, “Many companies use third-party players like DHL,
Accel to move their products from consumer to either the repair
centre or the OEM. Except for the call centre facility through which
the first level consultation is provided to customers for immediate
response to the problems, the rest is taken care by the reverse
logistics company appointed by the vendors.” He further added,
“This is like an aggregator business and any company would like to
outsource it to a network player with required skillset to execute
the job efficiently.”
PAIN
POINTS
In India,
a majority of players in this space are usually focusing on 1 or 2 of
the verticals of reverse logistics services, hence missing out on the
overall integrated services portfolio. Fewer full-service providers
operate in this arena, and have major thrust in metropolitans and
large cities and the irony is that the upcountry market goes for a
toss, when it comes to keep the IT-driven systems up and running at
the helm of managing reverse logistics. As of today, the external
factors that contribute to the inefficiencies in the industry include
industry fragmentation, constrained transport infrastructure,
regulatory issues and lack of trained resources. Internal factors
that pose challenges for the industry are customer expectations,
lack of scalability and accessibility,
reduced profit margins and market slowdown.
The set
of
challenges in this segment are multifold and the primary one is the
'age-old' challenges versus the 'new' challenges that
companies face today when managing their reverse logistics supply
chains. On this in a discussion forum, Moataz Sadaqah, SCM analyst,
Eli Lilly- European SSC, said, “Let's start with visibility and
track returns, managing and tracking the warranty for each part. And
I consider the biggest challenge is to standardize the process
globally.” He further mentioned, “These challenges are normally
faced by most of the organizations globally to standardize the
process and operate with minimum exception process (not CSR). There
is always customer special requirements (CSR), but once the process
is standardized globally this can deliver required result even with
several different CSR. Global standardized processes are not achieved
by just writing the process or using same ERP or return software
globally. The complexity core here is to implement the same process
to different regions where process does not complain with regulation
and laws, culture and the way the competitors operate.”
While,
Rich Madrid, consultant, Madrid Enterprises, stated, “From a reuse,
repair or warranty perspective, until a company is able to get its
No- Defect Found (NDF) rate under control, you probably want to have
some type of regional processing of returns. You can deploy a global
process, but there may be regional nuances in the internal return
decision (ie, VAT considerations), or a 3PL provider may offer advice
on the cost and benefits of specific regions and potential
workarounds.” He further added that tracking the returns is a
critical first step, and this calls for clear rules on 'transferred
not received' inventory and 'received not transferred'
shipments between all entities. However, how competitors operate is
the power of innovation that keeps us on our toes and looking for a
better 'mousetrap'.”
Adding to
this discussion, Lee Coleman, project manager, Nexicore Services
said, “The concepts of standard practices are very loose as you
travel the world. One issue is, religious days and national holidays
cause problems with reporting for global accounts. We had to create a
way for our reporting tool to pick out country to create TAT
(turn-around-time) reports due to this issue otherwise we would
inaccurately report performances, usually to our detriment.”
The
challenges are dynamic and subjective in nature. Many experts debate
on which is of more concern in reverse logistics? Whether it is
returns management, repair and remanufactureor value recovery and B
product sales? Michael McNair, national logistics manager, NBN
Project at Visionstream, mentioned, “The average real cost of
appliances is declining and the volume of appliances sold globally
continues to climb. From a triple bottom line perspective, in my
opinion, they are all complementary. Hard to give priority to any one
of them. A good returns management framework would include a strategy
for collection or disposal of products in the field, sorting of the
products returned and then decisions made, according to the process
(with weighted value given to sustainability or cost recovery) based
on the corporate agenda.” He further added, “There is certainly a
lot of value in remarketing appliances in second channels and they
often attract the segments, which are not shopping for new products,
so if they are marketed ethically it is a genuine opportunity to
recover cost and increase marketshare. If the products are indeed
resold and of good quality the word of mouth is invaluable.” While,
Harjit Kumar Khurana, service head, Nippo Batteries, stated, “I
think focus should primarily be on how to reduce returns rather than
how to manage them. There will then be less need for an organization
to remanufacture/recover value etc.” Also, manufacturing is
increasingly being outsourced to ODMs, leaving the 'manufacturer'
as either an assembler, or in the extreme, purely the badge on the
product. This changes the reverse logistics dynamics, as the repair
supplier base reduces and the links between manufacturing and service
become weaker. Often the move to increased outsourcing of
manufacturing, drives up the size and cost of the repairables,
which, when uncontrolled, has a devastating effect on stock holdings
and obsolescence. Add to this the ever increasing global legislation
on hazardous materials, such as WEEE and RoHS. These force operations
to not only look at reverse logistics for repairables, but for a much
wider range of low cost parts, previously treated as consumables.
Another
major pain point is the customs issues that plague operations and
impact performance. Nitin Shah said, “Another interesting point is
the involvement of SEZ where it becomes difficult to remove the
defective components out. Many times OEMs have replacement zones out
of india which make the process difficult and tedious due to the
government laws and custom duties involved.”Companies need to take
a 'drains up' approach to their reverse logistics operations. The
diagram below depicts 5 stages of maturity of reverse logistics. The
actions needs to be taken considering in which box they fall.
WORK
AROUNDS
Buisiness
models are always based on certain fundamentals. If a solution
provider gets it right, reverse logistics program can increase a
company's bottom line by 4% to 10% of sales. Highlighting on a few,
Jim Hauer, experienced sales manager from Greater Boston Area,
stated, “Choosing the right point of return is a very important
element of a very good reverse logistics program. Key factors on the
point of return include geography, testing/screening/
refurbishing/repairing capability and expertise on the type of
product being returned (white goods companies get lost on high tech
equipment), and market knowledge on the product being
returned (if hard drives are the key items/ what is being returned
then a company familiar with the hard drive market-prices,
channels, etc. is key). The speed and efficiency of the reverse
supply chain is very important. Products tend to devalue over time,
wherein 30 days can be a critical timeframe as a matter of fact.”
Adding to
this, Muralee Konda,manager, business development, 7Hills Business
Solutions, stated, “In reverse logistics there are multiple
processes involved and dependencies on thirdparty service providers
right from time of request to return based on the type of products
handled and the industry vertical. Defining KPI would be the need of
the business which is important for tracking and improvement. It
would be a continuous process and it would change with the time and
the business goals.” He further added, “However some standard
KPIs would be frequent consumables used in repairs, which would be
useful in identifying and improvement of product/ s, cost involved
right from receiving to delivery, time consumed at each stage of
reverse logistics and finally, resources and consumables used per
incident. In a comprehensive manner, Curtis Greve, managing partner,
Greve-Davis states the 'Five Rights of Reverse Logistics.'
Identify
the right source of the returned assets — Determining who returned
the product is perhaps the most critical step in any returns or
reclamation process. In a returns process, the receiving process is
what triggers the financial transaction with the customer. The
customer can be impacted directly, or in the case of retail returns,
the store's inventory will be negatively impacted. Crediting the
right entity for the assets they returned is critical. Diagnose the
right condition of the goods returned, which means whether the item
is new, used, defective, abused, etc. Recognizing the condition will
drive proper dispositioning of the goods. Properly diagnosing the
condition of any returned asset will impact the OEM/ODM, subsequent
recovery rates if liquidated, or will increase disposal costs. If,
for example, an item is new and has never been used, it might be
returned to the OEM/ODM for full cost credit. But if the condition is
mis-diagnosed, it may end up in the dumpster. This results in a loss
of value on the item plus additional rubbish removal fees.
Determine
the right disposition of goods processed in the reverse pipeline.
There are only 6 dispositions for any asset flowing through any
reverse logistics pipeline. The 6 dispositions are as follows: Return
to OEM/ODM for full or partial cost credit; Return to warehouse for
distribution next season; Sold on the secondary market for anywhere
between 2% and 90% of original value; Donated to charity, recycled
and, destroyed — sent to a landfill or incinerated. As one can
clearly see, determining which 'disposition bucket' returned
goods end up in having dramatic impact on whether a company pays
additional costs or if they receive significant credit for parties
down the line. Design the right process to efficiently process
returned assets in a timely fashion. Returns processing is critical
to ensuring companies maximize the value of goods flowing through
their reverse logistics/reclamation pipeline. Many companies do not
appreciate the importance of timely processing of returned goods.
Keep in mind that returned assets are not like wine. They don't get
better with age. Typical returns don't come in good packaging and
their condition will deteriorate over time, as will their value. For
example, electronic returns will lose 10% of their value per month on
the secondary market. Similarly, the percent of product that has to
be recycled or thrown in the dumpster will grow the longer product
sits on the dock. Processing goods efficiently and learning to deal
with seasonal spikes is critical to the overall contribution from the
reclamation center or returns process. Ensure the right amount is
charged to the right party for the processed returns.
Once the
goods have been received, sorted, and processed, the final step is to
ship product to the next party in the reverse supply chain. With
returns, this is more complicated than in distribution because the
value of the goods will vary based on disposition, the ship to point
will depend on the disposition, and the charges for the items depend
on the returns agreement and the party receiving the goods. There are
some companies which give credit for goods but only want specific
models sent back to them. The other models not returned to the
OEM/ODM might be recycled, destroyed, or liquidated. The variations
are endless and often there are consolidation fees, disposal fees,
and packaging fees that complicate the final billing even more.
For the
uninitiated, returns can be a confusing and costly part of their
supply chain. If, however, once the solution provider intends to
venture in to the business of reverse capabilities and incorporates
the above mentioned points, they may find significant amounts of
hidden profits that one can recover. Business benefits can be
measured using following metrics which include SLA compliance, repair
turn-aroundtime, cycle time, output yield, quality levels, and repair
failures.
WHY THIS
BUSINESS
There is
tremendous scope of opportunity yet to tapped by solution providers
in this space. Primary benefits of having reverse logistics
management include cost reduction, administration consolidation,
protected revenue and income, liability protection, resource
optimization, productivity and efficiency gains, and above all
customer experience improvement.
Shah
said,
“There is a huge opportunity in this sector because now things are
getting organized. Earlier many companies were using conventional
methods and they were expecting all the sales partners to take care
of warranty support also. And they were not capable of doing that
effectively as it is not their core strength.” Furthermore, he
added, “The companies now adopt a regional approach to manage their
reverse logistics involving regional partners and this will reduce
the burden on the OEM. The competition is so intense that repair or
replacement on a stipulated time becomes critical and this creates
opportunity for solution providers who can step and execute the
preliminary activities.”
The gains
are numerous here if partners decide to foray into this segment. The
level and quality of service will determine the profitability. As the
partners can then capitalize on end to end visibility, providing
maximum operation performance. Furthermore, one can improve asset
utilization and optimize customer service and SLAs. All this will
give a solution provider an edge over others in the competition.