Solution providers have a different way of functioning in India than the ones
based in developed countries. While the latter are more focused on a niche area,
desi solution providers provide end-to-end comprehensive solutions. It is
difficult to say which one of the two - niche or specialized solution providing
- is more fruitful, as they both have advantages and flip-sides attached to
them.
One would think that the trends in the Indian SI segment follow those of the
US. However, a cursory glance through the list of DQ Channels Silver Club list
of the top solution providers and SIs in the country throws up an interesting
aspect. More than 80% of the players listed are generic SIs and solution
partners, while specialist or niche SIs make up for a minuscule minority.
This is in sharp contrast to the US and other Western countries where
specialist or niche players typically dominate the mid-tier SI landscape. They
include SIs with a regional or state focus; those that restrict themselves to
domain—level expertise in specific areas such as media and entertainment
center; and those who follow the product route by developing their own solution
sets.
Further, there is a clear demarcation between tier-one and tier-two players.
Said Nitin Shah, MD, Allied Digital Services, "Fortune 500 companies abroad
are served only by the top rung SIs, while mid-tier enterprises are served by
the second rung."
The Indian scenario is a vast departure from this model in that even a huge
tier-one player like Wipro spans the gamut of projects from SMB to a large
Fortune 500 customer side deployment. So why do most Indian SIs risk spreading
themselves thin, rather than settle for a comfortably lucrative niche?
Evolving market
One would find some answers by looking at the way enterprises view IT today.
In the past, deploying IT meant implementing IT infrastructure (read hardware).
Today, IT is important for them in order to ensure business continuity and
productivity. Small and medium companies prefer to have flexible but limited IT
services, while large enterprises need to ensure that they have specialists to
take care of their critical needs since it is a strategic business requirement.
Another
reason why SMBs prefer to go with one partner is because it becomes cumbersome
to manage multiple Service Level Agreements (SLA). Some of the mid-sized IT
companies that are trying to scale up in the industry are beginning to go with
niche SIs for domain expertise since they need to follow international standards
like Sarbannes-Oaxley.
KN Prasad, who heads the Marketing and Alliances at Apara Enterprise
Solutions, which deals in storage, networking and security solutions, draws the
analogy of medical specialists. "Today even in medicine, you have
specialists. You don't go to a general physician if you have an ailment."
He observed that large enterprises are more inclined towards specialist SIs
especially in mission critical areas. "Today if there's a slight hitch
anywhere in the system, the data center catches a cold. Companies cannot afford
to lose even one minute. Specialization is just catching up here."
'Pizza versus multi-cuisine'
This is how Nitin Shah summed up the specialist —generic SI scenario. Both
type of players have their share of pluses and downsides. We asked a few of the
major players for their take on the business.
Network Solutions (Netsol), which won the DQ Channels Excellence award for
2004 for 'Most Successful Solution Provider' focuses on Infrastructure
management. Netsol's MD, Sudhir Sarma opined, "Being a niche player is
advantageous as you are looked upon as the expert in that space. We can provide
significant value add and expertise in a chosen area. But the disadvantage is
you could miss out opportunities where customers insist on you providing a
comprehensive end to end IT solution."
Sanjiv Bhavnani, CEO and MD of Visesh Infotecnics, felt that niche players
who know their domain better have better chances of success in their defined
market and may also command a premium for their services. "However, the
choice of the niche needs to be balanced in order to achieve sustained growth
and profitability, as most industries are cyclical in their nature. Hence a
well-balanced portfolio of industry verticals and services needs to be
maintained in order to build a good and sustainable SI."
While specialist players have to invest in building capabilities, the
payoffs are in terms of high profitability. Added Mukund Ramarathnam, Marketing
and Business Development director, AMD Far East, "For specialists, it is
not a volumes game and since they are domain experts, profitability is
high."
Mukund believes that the market is in a growth phase and is only warming up
now to the value that specialists provide. Pointing out that customers have to
realize the premium that specialists bring to the field, Prasad thinks that in a
mature market, people would pay for skills.
Rather than remaining complacent in their respective niches, players must
make sure they have a good set of industry verticals that they can tap. Industry
verticals like BFSI, service providers, telecom, energy, manufacturing and BPOs
are the segments, which would go partner with specialist SIs.
Apara's Prasad also contends that sometimes, a specific area ceases being
niche. "Currently, storage and security is no longer a niche, because the
space is getting complex and crowded with many players. The industry itself has
evolved."
'If you can't beat them, join them' goes a saying. Apara follows this
strategy by partnering with generic SIs. "If generic SIs want our
specialist skills, we work with them on the backend while they are on front-end
customer projects. This could be on project basis or at the strategic
level," stated Prasad.
Going global
With the winds of globalization blowing into India, the world is an
universal playground for SIs. Both generic and niche SIs are exploring markets
abroad, which could boost not just their bank accounts, but also their stature
back home. Most SIs who want to venture abroad prefer to begin by looking at
uncharted territories like the Benelux region in Europe, Thailand, Yemen and Sri
Lanka to name a few.
Going to underdeveloped markets translates into easier access to markets, not
much competition to contend with and opportunities for providing end-to-end
solutions. On the other hand, it is difficult to gain a foothold in developed
countries like the US or UK where local providers are well established in the
market.
Nitin remarked, "People want a partner who is agile, responds to change
in needs, are flexible and has proven management skills. SIs need to go out of
their way to take care of customers. This is where outsiders fail."
Niche players like Netsol have also announced plans to raise money to acquire
companies with matching capabilities abroad. This could be a trend that could
get widespread.
Getting competitive
With SIs competing on both volume and price, it is a tough game to win.
Companies can differentiate by developing their own unique set of service
capabilities. Instead of looking at easy opportunities, SIs and solution
partners could raise the bar by identifying their strengths and strengthening
them by investing in skills.
Nitin said that his market strategy is to look for high-hanging fruits, which
all cannot reach. "The niche players can't reach there. We are able to
serve large customers who require our presence everywhere. We have 62 locations
in India alone." He warns that following the franchisee route could
jeopardize customer relationships.
And how does one become a specialist player? "Solution providers have to
identify an area and develop special capabilities, build strengths and become
central to customer needs. This could be a gateway to other niches,"
suggested Mukund.
However diverse the SI trends may be in the US and India, there are some
unalterable aspects to the business that hold good to any SI. These include
adding value to customers, improving efficiencies and differentiating oneself in
the market.
PRIYA PADMANABHAN
CyberMedia News (With inputs from New Delhi & Amishi Shah in Mumbai)